Program

Workshop schedule

All times are in EST time zone

09:00 - 10:30Session 1
09:00 - 09:15Workshop opening
09:15 - 09:20Summarizing Long Regulatory Documents with a Multi-Step Pipeline
Mika Sie, Ruby Beek, Michiel Bots, Sjaak Brinkkemper, Albert Gatt
09:20 - 09:25Towards an Automated Pointwise Evaluation Metric for Generated Long-Form Legal Summaries
Shao Min Tan, Quentin Grail, Lee Quartey
09:25 - 09:30Cross Examine: An Ensemble-based approach to leverage Large Language Models for Legal Text Analytics
Saurav Chowdhury, Lipika Dey, Suyog Joshi
09:30 - 09:35LexSumm and LexT5: Benchmarking and Modeling Legal Summarization Tasks in English
Santosh T.Y.S.S, Cornelius Johannes Weiss and Matthias Grabmair
09:35 - 09:40Algorithm for Automatic Legislative Text Consolidation
Matias Etcheverry, Thibaud Real-del-sarte, Pauline Chavallard
09:40 - 09:50Joint Q&A
09:50 - 09:55LeGen: Complex Information Extraction from Legal Sentences using Generative Models
Chaitra C R, Sankalp Kulkarni, Sai Rama Akash Varma Sagi, Shashank Pandey, Rohit Yalavarthy, Dipanjan Chakraborty, Prajna Devi Upadhyay
09:55 - 10:00Information Extraction for Planning Court Cases
Drish Mali, Rubash Mali, Claire Barale
10:00 - 10:05Automated Anonymization of Parole Hearing Transcripts
Abed El Rahman Itani, Wassiliki Siskou, Annette Hautli-Janisz
10:05 - 10:10BLT: Can Large Language Models Handle Basic Legal Text?
Andrew Blair-Stanek, Nils Holzenberger, Benjamin Van Durme
10:10 - 10:15Classify First, and Then Extract: Prompt Chaining Technique for Information Extraction
Alice Saebom Kwak, Clayton T. Morrison, Derek Bambauer, Mihai Surdeanu
10:15 - 10:20HiCuLR: Hierarchical Curriculum Learning for Rhetorical Role Labeling of Legal Documents
Santosh T.Y.S.S, Apolline Isaia, Shiyu Hong, Matthias Grabmair
10:20 - 10:30Joint Q&A
10:30 - 11:00Break
11:00 - 12:30Session 2
11:00 - 11:05Rethinking Legal Judgement Prediction in a Realistic Scenario in the Era of Large Language ModelsShubham Kumar Nigam, Aniket Deroy, Subhankar Maity, Arnab Bhattacharya
11:05 - 11:10The CLC-UKET Dataset: Benchmarking Case Outcome Prediction for the UK Employment Tribunal
Huiyuan Xie, Felix Steffek, Joana Ribeiro de Faria, Christine Carter, Jonathan Rutherford
11:10 - 11:15 Transductive Legal Judgment Prediction Combining BERT Embeddings with Delaunay-Based GNNs
Hugo Attali, Nadi Tomeh
11:15 - 11:20 Comparative Study of Explainability Methods for Legal Outcome Prediction
Ieva Raminta Staliunaite, Josef Valvoda, Ken Satoh
11:20 - 11:25 Incorporating Precedents for Legal Judgement Prediction on European Court of Human Rights Cases
Santosh T.Y.S.S, Mohamed Hesham Elganayni, Stanisław Sójka, Matthias Grabmair
11:25 - 11:30 The Craft of Selective Prediction: Towards Reliable Case Outcome Classification - An Empirical Study on European Court of Human Rights Cases
Santosh T.Y.S.S, Irtiza Chowdhury, Shanshan Xu, Matthias Grabmair
11:30 - 11:45Joint Q&A
11:45 - 11:50 Quebec Automobile Insurance Question-Answering With Retrieval-Augmented Generation
David Beauchemin, Richard Khoury, Zachary Gagnon
11:50 - 11:55 Attributed Question Answering for Preconditions in the Dutch Law
Felicia Redelaar, Romy van Drie, Suzan Verberne, Maaike de Boer
11:55 - 12:00 Measuring the Groundedness of Legal Question-Answering Systems
Dietrich Trautmann, Natalia Ostapuk, Quentin Grail, Adrian Alan Pol, Guglielmo Bonifazi, Shang Gao, Martin Gajek
12:00 - 12:10Joint Q&A
12:10 - 14:00Lunch & In-Person Poster Session (Lunch provided)
14:00 - 15:30Session 3
14:00 - 15:00Keynote Talk
Omri Ben-Shahar - Privacy Protection, At What Cost?
15:00 - 15:15 Shared Task: Enhancing Legal Violation Identification with LLMs and Deep Learning Techniques: Achievements in the LegalLens 2024 Competition
Ben hagag, Gil Gil Semo, Dor Bernsohn, liav harpaz, Pashootan Vaezipoor, Rohit Saha, Kyryl Truskovskyi, Gerasimos Spanakis
15:15 - 15:30 Shared Task Winner presentation
15:30 - 16:00Break
16:00 - 17:30Session 4
16:00 - 16:05LLMs to the Rescue: Explaining DSA Statements of Reason with Platform's Terms of Services
Marco Aspromonte, Andrea Filippo Ferraris, Federico Galli, Giuseppe Contissa
16:05 - 16:10Enhancing Contract Negotiations with LLM-Based Legal Document Comparison
Savinay Narendra, Kaushal Shetty, Adwait Ratnaparkhi
16:10 - 16:15Multi-Property Multi-Label Documents Metadata Recommendation based on Encoder Embeddings
Nasredine Cheniki, Vidas Daudaravicius, Abdelfettah Feliachi, Didier Hardy, Marc Wilhelm Küster
16:15 - 16:20CLERC: A Dataset for U. S. Legal Case Retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Analysis Generation
Abe Bohan Hou, Orion Weller, Guanghui Qin, Eugene Yang, Dawn Lawrie, Nils Holzenberger, Andrew Blair-Stanek, Benjamin Van Durme
16:20 - 16:25Empowering Air Travelers: A Chatbot for Canadian Air Passenger Rights
Maksym Taranukhin, Sahithya Ravi, Gabor Lukacs, Evangelos Milios, Vered Shwartz
16:25 - 16:30The impact of formulaic language in the Court of Justice of the European Union on the performance of lexical and dense retrieval methods
Larissa Mori, Carlos Sousa de Oliveira, Yuehwern Yih, Mario Ventresca
16:30 - 16:40Joint Q&A
16:40 - 16:45Gaps or Hallucinations? Scrutinizing Machine-Generated Legal Analysis for Fine-grained Text Evaluations
Abe Bohan Hou, William Jurayj, Nils Holzenberger, Andrew Blair-Stanek, Benjamin Van Durme
16:45 - 16:50How Many Van Goghs Does It Take to Van Gogh? Finding the Imitation Threshold
Sahil Verma, Royi Rassin, Arnav Mohanty Das, Gantavya Bhatt, Preethi Seshadri, Chirag Shah, Jeff Bilmes, Hannaneh Hajishirzi and Yanai Elazar
16:50 - 16:55Towards Supporting Legal Argumentation with NLP: Is More Data Really All You Need?
Santosh T.Y.S.S, Kevin Ashley, Katie Atkinson and Matthias Grabmair
16:55 - 17:00Misinformation with Legal Consequences (MisLC): A New Task Towards Harnessing Societal Harm of Misinformation
Chu Fei Luo, Radin Shayanfar, Rohan V Bhambhoria, Samuel Dahan, Xiaodan Zhu
17:00 - 17:10Joint Q&A
17:10 - 17:15LAR-ECHR: A New Legal Argument Reasoning Task and Dataset for Cases of the European Court of Human Rights
Odysseas S. Chlapanis, Dimitris Galanis, Ion Androutsopoulos
17:15 - 17:20Developing a Pragmatic Benchmark for Assessing Korean Legal Language Understanding in Large Language Models
Kimyeeun, Choi Youngrok, Eunkyung Choi, JinHwan Choi, Hai Jin Park, Wonseok Hwang
17:20 - 17:25Enhancing Legal Expertise in Large Language Models through Composite Model Integration: The Development and Evaluation of Law-Neo
Zhihao Liu, Yanzhen Zhu, Mengyuan Lu
17:25 - 17:30Joint Q&A
17:30 - 17:40Best Presentation Award